4G64 SDS Finally Dyno'd w/Less-than-satisfying numbers...
Before I roll in to it, I'll pre-empt this all by saying I am not wholey satified with the numbers my setup put down. In themselves the numbers are good, but not at the level the Ripp SDS Kit (1.0) was advertised to be.
With that said, this is my ride:
2001 Mitsubishi Galant
4G64 I4 (2.4L) SOHC
Auto Transmission
Stock Rated HP: 145 Crank HP (est. 107-109 WHP)
Stock Rated TQ: 155
And the mods I have (that matter here):
Ripp 4G64 1st Gen. SDS Kit consiting of:
* Walboro 255 Fuel Pump
* Malpassi FPR - set at 52-54 psi
* Vortech V5 G-Trim Centrifiugal Supercharger
* 5th Injector - mounted in intake, on at boost
* 2 Bar MAP Sensor
* Standard Crank Pulley (5-6 psi of boost)
* RIPP Black Box - piggy-back adaptive computer
Ripp Headers
Ripp mid-pipe w/high-flow cat
(note: stock piping from mid-pipe to muffler)
Brospeed straight-thru muffler
Without going into great detail on runs done, the final run of the car provided the best numbers at 170 WHP (est. 210-220 HP at the crank?) and 165 TQ. As I said, I had hoped for more - should have hit around 185 WHP, and definitely higher on TQ. All-in-all, I'm content - but not eccstatic - with a 63WHP/59% gain over stock - especially considering the excessive loss inherrent in the Mistsu auto transmission.
But still, either Ripps Dyno's were somehow inflated or I'm missing something on my setup. We had questions after initial numbers regarding setup parameters and such so I got Ripp ont he phone to verify a few things. I ended up having the shop boss talk directly with Ross to make sure we weren't missing anything. As it turns out, all was just as it should be, except we were not hitting the numbers Ripp has previosly given. The shop boss thought it was somewhat suspicious that Ross said the belt has a tendancy to slip and to apply some belt-dressing for better numbers. WTF??? I didn't know that was a "feature" of the kit.
Also in question were the A/F numbers. Up to around 4500 RPM we were at 12.5 but then the car gradually leaned out until we were at 13.8 at 6200 RPM. Arguably, this is a very lean condition - but according to Ross, the 4G64 "like" the mix that lean, produce better numbers at that mix, and are in no danger from running so lean. I'm still wary.
I'll continue to work with this setup for now and see if more power can be had - there's gotta be something holding back. But before too long, maybe by spring, I am going to look at upgrading tothe 1.5 or 2.0 SDS which adds 440cc injectors, a larger crank pulley for 10-11 psi of boost, a Water-Meth cooler, and an electronic boost controller. Numbers for this setup on an ES Auto 4G64 posted on Ripp's site show 268.7 WHP... but given my experience with the 1.0, maybe I'll see 240 WHP?
Anyone with the SDS - or turbo'd for that matter - that can think of where I might look to reclaim those extra 5-10-15 HP I should be seeing, let me know!
J