MAFT vs. SAFC

Printable View

10-14-2009, 11:07 AM
skrap

MAFT vs. SAFC

Wich do you guys think would be better...
10-14-2009, 11:31 AM
GOOSEY2099

maft
10-14-2009, 12:00 PM
skrap

Quote:

Originally Posted by GOOSEY2099

maft

Why? lol
10-14-2009, 12:19 PM
mko

How bout both. gen1 Maft is good for translating, but its not good for fine tuning. SAFC is good for fine tuning. MAFT gen2 = MAFT gen 1+ SAFC
10-14-2009, 12:30 PM
kolio

maft gen 2

tuning+translating+wideband tracking and adjusting(auto adjusts to keep whatever AFR you want)
10-14-2009, 02:03 PM
Shadow19

Or Maft pro and you can run speed density! Thats what im going to be running in my 7g. SHould be here tomorrow.
10-14-2009, 05:09 PM
Galanttuner10

im going to run safc for a while then when i fully build the galant im gonna go to maft pro or gen 2
10-14-2009, 11:36 PM
DOHCstunr

safc 1 2 neo..... pointless.
sell it to a honda ricer and get a maft gen 2

higher resolution, more tuning points, 3 load ranges, injector scaling, LOGGING CAPABILITY!!!!! wideband tracking/closed loop wot

and on top of all of htis it allows you to throw your oddly shaped, uber-restrictive stock mass airflow sensor in the trash; and run a pretty 3"(or 3.5") GM mass airflow sensor that will go perfectly into your custom air intake or turbo system.

once you are turbo, you can run your gm MAS after your blow-off valve so you can vent your blow-off vlave to the atmosphere and make super cool turbo noises.