Have a system and your lights dim?
I have a 800watt amp and 2 MTX Thunder3128 12" subs, I dont use a capacitor.. just one distro block. I thought my altnator was the problem but I changed my battery terminals to brass ones. The problem is fixed, no more dimming https://www.thegalantcenter.org/styl...ault/smile.gif . You can get them from AutoZone for $2.49 each. Just thought I'd share this with the other 7th gens.
tried it, and other stuff too
I tried the batt terminals, (both) it still did it, tried the monster cable ones too ($15 a piece) and it helped, but not much.
I even tried a 1 farad capacitor (rockford fosgate) and they still dimmed, it seems as if the capacitor is not even working.
My setup:
two rockford fosgate 1001bd power amps (amp birth certificate states 1400watts each),
each driving separate 2000 watt pioneer ts-w2000 competition 12's,
each with a 1 farad capacitor on 1/0 AWG cable.
alpine mr-pt20 4ch amp driving alpine type-r components, and alpine type-r 6x9's, amp on 8 AWG cable.
pioneer avh-p7480dvd in dash dvd/mp3/cd/etc...
pioneer xm radio tuner
If anyone knows how to fix the headlight problem, please let me know (all lights will dim even interior and guages)
Let's move this to the audio forum, the topic has shifted
Firstly, rockford subs suck ass, I used two Pioneer Competition 12" subs
Secondly, 155 was tested at the dash as well, there were no special setups, the rear seat was up in it's natural position, the trunk was closed, etc. This accounts for having a well sealed, well sound insulated car (dynamat, etc.), and a well built box. The sound was not lost in the metal. Yes, there was a difference at 155 with the quality, but I never listened to the system that loud, once it was back down to around 130-135 or so, the quality remained excellent. I didn't use any cheat factors either, like digital bass boost or anything, the exact same procedures that the car audio shop uses for any car. They only allowed for a short amount of tuning, and then they wouldn't let me do anything until the test was over. They used the same procedures to test as would be used in an IASCA competition.
Thirdly, I don't really care if you think this is BS or not, because this is what my system performed.
Also, I paid WAY less than the numbers I put up there, but I got dealer discounts, if it weren't for that, I'd have gone with other brands. I only paid $50/ea for the subs, and 150 each for the amps, and since I made my own box (using a cad program to determine the exact correct volume for those particular subs. If I remember right it was 1.034 cubic feet that each separate chamber came to. It's been a few years since I built the box.), it was only $50, the wires too were only about $40. That brings the total I paid to: $490 for a $2010 (which by the way, half of is only $1005, you paid 75.87% of my system at retail) system.
Your info in the equation for comparison purposes, ends up with $8.57 dpd, whereas my system at retail was $8.74 dpd, only a small difference.
Fourthly, this debate is pointless. Both systems can make at least the somewhat reasonable 130 db in a non-competition scenario (real world listening) and even my younger brother's system that is running on a mere 380 watts max is sufficient for the average non-IASCA-competing galant driver. I paid way less than you or most people, and I am satisfied in my purchase, as well as you are, I'm sure. This has got to be the longest drawn out argument over nothing important. I have nothing more to say on the subject.
And finally, throw is spelled T-H-R-O-W, not your dumbass way of spelling it through (this word is used in the sentence: Sound waves travel through the air by vibrating the air molecules.) But maybe you were too busy making paper airplanes in elementary to have been paying attention in class.