The Galant Center - Powered by vBulletin

Thread: EVO SWAP INTO A 99-03 GALANT????

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Showing results 41 to 46 of 46
  1. #41
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(GroceryGetterES)</div><div class='quotemain'>
    You need to revise your post. Â*
    </div>

    I don't thinks so, but thanks for trying.

  2. #42
    GroceryGetterES
    Guest
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(gtx)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(GroceryGetterES)</div><div class='quotemain'>
    You need to revise your post. Â*
    </div>

    I don't thinks so, but thanks for trying.</div>

    If you want to look like a fool then be my guest.

    Though you would think someone with 800+ posts in a Mitsu forum would have more knowledge about what Mitsu is involved in.

  3. #43
    Senior Moderator DOHCstunr's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-17-2004
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    4,328
    mitsu doesn't make the srt4 motor.
    the chrysler 420a is what came in the 2g eclipse non turbo, as well as dodge neons, and a 2.4 liter version came in the pt cruisers. that engine in no way reflects mitsubishi.

    same goes for the 2.4 thats in the srt4.
    nothign from the srt4 is mitsu related.

    just so you know.
    ______________________________

    1994 Galant GS-Turbo

  4. #44
    Driving is only half the fun 8)
    2.4L - AWD - 5SPEED - PTE 6057 at __PSI w/Wavetrac LSD

  5. #45

    I can't believe this

    I can't believe that some of you guys have galants and discourage other guys from tuning there own galants. If i had the money to swap a 4g63t in my 8g, I would do it in a heart beat and wouldn't think twice about how much my resail value would be. I would build it to have fun, and to kick the ass of most 4 cylinders and some 6 out there. My suggestion is to have fun with your G and most of us here will help you in any way we can. Good luck.

  6. #46
    Experienced TGC Member milo111000's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-06-2005
    Location
    Long beach/ guam
    Posts
    1,585
    i think what they're trying to say is that our gs have lots of potential. but weight would be one factor why makin our g's the # 1 factor why it would never be the super car we all want it to be.. thoughts are great, but then again we've got Seniores here who'd thought, tried, and experienced those things.. so i would just respect there comments..

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •