MAFT vs. ECU Rom tuning

**mysticj** · 03-20-2007, 08:16 AM

Which is better? Discuss.

**Sleepervr-4** · 03-20-2007, 10:32 AM

I love my maft gen 2 :mrgreen: for info http://www.maftpro.com/tgen2info.shtml I love the fact that it has less restriction that a 7g mas (honeycombs) it also can correct up to +/- 62% fuel correction at 12 rpm points. Has wideband tracking at wot. And has a logging feature to use power logger to help tune your car.

**laxinwarrior** · 03-20-2007, 11:21 AM

What exactly is your goal? The Maft works great but it has it's limitations, so give us an idea what your setup includes and we may be able to help out better.

**mysticj** · 03-20-2007, 05:56 PM

the best bang for the buck. actually something to tune a 10.5:1 engine with a 6200rpm redline.

**Sleepervr-4** · 03-20-2007, 07:54 PM

Originally Posted by mysticj

the best bang for the buck. actually something to tune a 10.5:1 engine with a 6200rpm redline.

why so rich you can go 11.5:1 safely. I do and have no problems and my egt's stay under 1550F. btw if you have a set a/f ratio in mind did I mention the Maft Gen 2 has wideband tracking :D

**mysticj** · 03-21-2007, 09:02 AM

Originally Posted by Sleepervr-4

Originally Posted by mysticj

the best bang for the buck. actually something to tune a 10.5:1 engine with a 6200rpm redline.

why so rich you can go 11.5:1 safely. I do and have no problems and my egt's stay under 1550F. btw if you have a set a/f ratio in mind did I mention the Maft Gen 2 has wideband tracking :D

I meant a 10.5:1 compression instead of 10.5:1 AFR

Log in X

View Poll Results: Tuning Options

Thread: MAFT vs. ECU Rom tuning

Thread Tools

MAFT vs. ECU Rom tuning

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Rules