IMO the stock 4g64 is shit period no matter what tranny it is hooked up to
its only making something like 150hp to the crank so fromt he crank to the floor your loosing about 40-50 hp
Yeah the Automatic tranny is what is really robbing our power. If we had a better transmission that can put down most of the power to the wheels we can have a good 160hp car. Also are intake plenums are shit, so that takes power away from the engine. With that outlander swap you can see some results.
I dyno'd my I4 at 369.9whp....but that was with an EVO swap, hey I mean... Its still an I4
99' Galant ESOriginally Posted by qnz
4G64/63T
AEM EMS
punk ass!!Originally Posted by Stewi
@9G dang!! you just cracked me up!! f!$#%$$ with the ac on it's like 50hp! wahahahahaah WTF?!?! so true though
Icedo had a exhaust, short ram and a 5spd swap and only put down 103, I really don't think the slush box auto is the real problem, its the N/A motor, that think is already maxed out at the factory like most japense I4's are.Originally Posted by DNSerrano
lol thread is pretty amusing.
Earlier I was looking at reviews on the 8g 2003 ES i4. Click here for link.
For others who are to lazy to click...
The site at consumer guide auto states...
Powertrain Options and Availability
DE and ES models had a 145-horsepower 2.4-liter 4-cylinder engine; the ES V6, LS, and GTZ got a 195-hp 3.0-liter V6. Both engines were offered only with a 4-speed automatic transmission. In 2002, the 4-cyl engine was newly standard on LS models.
i4 hp/tq: 145/155
v6 hp/tq: 195/205
No clue how accurate the information is though. And most obviously the hp/tq ratings are not at the wheels..
'o4 Acura TL: Dynamic ;; AEM | P2R | Falken
Sound.Vision.Soul // Drive.Drift.Dream
Your car is awesome, what's it putting down for dyno numbers and what are your 1/4 mile times. Your list of mods and the look of your car is a pure 10. :)Originally Posted by IceDouTGaLanT
lol, true. i assume that's bhp.
wish my car was a v6, that's a huge difference with only 2 more pistons.
either way, i'm gonna try to find a dyno facility in my area. i still wanna see how i'm doing. :?
02 Mit. Galant 5 Spd -> 2010 Mit. Lancer Sportback 5 Spd -> (current) 2014 Mit Evo GSR 5 Spd
run1206's Rear Disc Tutorial
run1206's CF Hood Resurface Tutorial
i4 hp/tq: 145/155
v6 hp/tq: 195/205
No clue how accurate the information is though. And most obviously the hp/tq ratings are not at the wheels..[/quote]
Try more like 140hp 155ftlbs for the I4, 145 wishful thinking
Try more like 140hp 155ftlbs for the I4, 145 wishful thinking [/quote]Originally Posted by silverlightning
02 Mit. Galant 5 Spd -> 2010 Mit. Lancer Sportback 5 Spd -> (current) 2014 Mit Evo GSR 5 Spd
run1206's Rear Disc Tutorial
run1206's CF Hood Resurface Tutorial
[quote="silverlightning"]Your car is awesome, what's it putting down for dyno numbers and what are your 1/4 mile times. Your list of mods and the look of your car is a pure 10. :)[/quoteOriginally Posted by IceDouTGaLanT
thanks alot man, at 6lbs i dyno'd 170WHP. Never took it on the track yet, hopefully soon. this winter im doing the evo head swap and gona try 10lbs-12lbs see how that works. But even with 6lbs its a HUGE differnce n feels like a whole new car
00 Galant ES Turbo/5-Speed
13 GTR
damn, just 6 lbs can get you to 190whp??
amazing
i'm reading up on the Evo/Kia head swap
http://www.club3g.com/forum/3g-eclip...arts-list.html
http://www.club3g.com/forum/rs-gs/50...w-project.html
i'm curious if i could still use the Outlander IM with the swap, but i assume so cuz if we can use either evo/outlander IM, then it fits, but that's off topic. :oops:
02 Mit. Galant 5 Spd -> 2010 Mit. Lancer Sportback 5 Spd -> (current) 2014 Mit Evo GSR 5 Spd
run1206's Rear Disc Tutorial
run1206's CF Hood Resurface Tutorial
opps sorry wrong info given, i just checked my charts i have the Tq power..my stock base graph is on my turbo thread page 8 incase anybody wants to see
00 Galant ES Turbo/5-Speed
13 GTR
Might beat us? A civic Si will rape us. That thing is 197hp at the crank, so even if you factor in the drivetrain loss they'll hang with a V6 8G easy.Originally Posted by DNSerrano
No good. The EVO intake manifold will not work with the SOHC head, therefore the outlander manifold wont work with the EVO head.Originally Posted by run1206
99' Galant ESOriginally Posted by qnz
4G64/63T
AEM EMS
LOL yeah that and the fact that they are 700 lbs lighter than us......Originally Posted by SkylineG1
99' Galant ESOriginally Posted by qnz
4G64/63T
AEM EMS
you will need to use the Evo IM. Which is still a good IM.Originally Posted by run1206
Thats scary.. We are talking about the SI and not the SI-R right? If that's so.. I don't want to picture us up against the Civic-ROriginally Posted by Stewi
'o4 Acura TL: Dynamic ;; AEM | P2R | Falken
Sound.Vision.Soul // Drive.Drift.Dream
NOOOOOOOO!!!!!! :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :evil:Originally Posted by Stewi
oh well...
02 Mit. Galant 5 Spd -> 2010 Mit. Lancer Sportback 5 Spd -> (current) 2014 Mit Evo GSR 5 Spd
run1206's Rear Disc Tutorial
run1206's CF Hood Resurface Tutorial
well, when it comes to power, i dont really want to mention it.
heavy 4door sedan with 140HP? of course we will get killed in terms of power.
but i love the bullet proofed 4g64 cast iron block. Sure damn reliable.
i like the reliability of the galant, and its cheap price, good value over all. pretty decent ride. i mean if I wanna go for power, i would go for the New Evo X when it comes out.
Bookmarks