2.6L Stroker kit.

[DOHCstunr]

Damn thats a long rod, I bet that piston is short as hell, I wonder how low the top ring is and the spacing for the rest, my top ring is like 12mm below the top of the ring land, theirs would have to be half that or less.

yeah i already said it was going to be a short slug with that 106mm stroke..... but compound that with a crackhead longrod........ and that piston is about as tall as my krispykreme laying flat

[6G72gearhead]

50trim ball bearing, GT30R. Im not gonna say the 35R because that turbo tends to really shine in the uppre RPMS past 6500.

Will the engine be able to flow enough cfm to use a 35R, we are talking another .6L more displacement then the cars we are used to seeing equipped with such a turbo. I havent seen the compressor efficiency maps for these turbo, but I'd imagine a 2.6L motor would be right in the middle of the efficiency of the two turbo's.

[Stewi]

Read what I wrote over again.

[laxinwarrior]

Ok here is the second response from BC after asking about the safe rev limit, rod angles, piston size, etc.:

The kit has a 6.151" center to center rod which makes the rod / stroke
ratio - 1.47 which is ideal for the stroker application. The engine is safe
to rpm as high as your valve train will let it go (9000+). We worked closely
with the engineers at CP pistons when developing this kit. It has a piston
compression height of 1.014". Plenty safe fro extreme applications.

[DOHCstunr]

Ok here is the second response from BC after asking about the safe rev limit, rod angles, piston size, etc.:

The kit has a 6.151" center to center rod which makes the rod / stroke
ratio - 1.47 which is ideal for the stroker application. The engine is safe
to rpm as high as your valve train will let it go (9000+). We worked closely
with the engineers at CP pistons when developing this kit. It has a piston
compression height of 1.014". Plenty safe fro extreme applications.

there wasw nothing in that statement that said there was any reason to rev that high.....
you can rev to 9k on most any engine if its internals are strong enough and you have a decent valvetrain.....
but if you stop making power at 6k rpms.............................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. ........................ why would you rev that high?

[laxinwarrior]

I'm starting to get the feeling that they haven't REALLY tested out this kit. I mean so far all they've told me is just a few more numbers than what is stated on their website. :evil:

[mtcavity1]

I don't think there is a reason to rev past 7000 RPM with a stroker much like our stock engines compaired to the 2 liter turbo. That is one of the reasons I got a small turbo to begin with, exploit the low end power.

Won't the "max" HP be relized around 2500-4500/5500, like most strokers?

[Stewi]

Typically yes, but thats only if the turbo hits its peak at that point. Like if I put a GT35R on my motor and revved to 7500 with a good tune, I would keep increasing power all the way to redline, because the turbo still has a ton of air feeding the motor and its not maxed out, like it would be if I was using a 16g or something.

[mtcavity1]

So you have "balls" from 2000 RPM to whenever you feel like shifting? (depending on turbo)

Freaken nice! :) I did not know that...

RPW preaches strokers for most all of their applications and now I know why.

[Stewi]

Yeah you really just have to combine your motor with a turbo that flows enough air and can be effectively spooled up within a reasonable amount of time for your setup. perfect example, on my old motor, my turbo spooled at roughly 4200 and my redline was 8500, but I didnt make power passed 7500 because of stock cams, so that was pretty much 3800RPMs worth of useable power. Now I have a 2.4, cams, and larger valves, the turbo should spool at about 3500, redline at 7500, but im going to make power that entire time because nothing is really limiting me.

[XXL4G64]

I like from what i been reading i like talk about the 2.6 i would like to know if that is the other site and from what i see slowboy dont sale 2.6 stroker kit's...But i talk to a few people and what i been hearing is it is almost like having a turbo car if everything is done right.

[milo111000]

wow talk about months ago.. nice up bro

[4g63lover]

wow talk about months ago.. nice up bro

damn Milo where the hell have you been?

[milo111000]

hahaha jigaz!!! sup bitch?!?! just been busy bro.. work work.. missed this dam ol place!!

[4g63lover]

hahaha jigaz!!! sup bitch?!?! just been busy bro.. work work.. missed this dam ol place!!

haha. damn G still running?

[milo111000]

hhaah of course.. just a little problem with the maf but it's all good. i was looking at this VR 4 type S in melbourne last i was there selling for $7k. just gotta figure out how to ship it.. lol.. go real VR than tune my silly galant..

[bignasty]

Look what i found

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uBIwSs-Yafo


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=taMMLqMXBy4


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qtCDzDUijDA

[mysticj]

A 2.6L is too extreme for a street application. A 2.5L will be reasonable and cheaper than doing a 2.6L stroker kit. Just purchase a 102mm stroker crank, stock length rods, and custom pistons with a 34mm compression height.

[bignasty]

My question to you is: do you get those same results from a 2.5 like the 2.6. I mean for .1 of a liter will you get results or just wasted money on minimum results. I dont want to offend, i just want to make sure. im the kind of person if i am going to spend the money, i want my money well spent. i want to feel night and day differences. And again I dont want to offend.