The Galant Center - Powered by vBulletin

Thread: big 6g7x IM

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Showing results 1 to 20 of 31
  1. #1
    Experienced TGC Member mysticj's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-18-2004
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    1,029

    big 6g7x IM

    Found this...
    94 Galant GS: 4G67 head, 1G IM, Evo 8 TB, DeltaCam 272/264 Cams, Test Pipe, OE Avenger V6 60mm catback w/muffler, modified Outlander header, DIY COP setup, B/S delete, 315cc injectors, AEM UEGO WBO2, Black case 3G ECU

    1994 GS FYI
    DSM/CSM Manuals

  2. #2
    You are here entirely tooo much!! beam514's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-03-2007
    Location
    Socal/Central Coast
    Posts
    3,803
    hollllly sh*t. That actual opens up a lot of room on the rear valve cover, and allows for simple maintenance like changing the spark plugs without having to remove the damn IM

  3. #3
    Damn... it's facing the wrong way. Anyway, where did you find that!?!?
    '99 5-Speed GTZ: Forged 3.6L 6G74T 6764 E85
    2017: 552whp/562wtq SBE on 19psi
    '02 Eclipse GT: 6G72 M/T-swapped Daily Driver
    '10 Endeavor: 6G75 AWD Family-mobile

  4. #4
    You are here entirely tooo much!! beam514's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-03-2007
    Location
    Socal/Central Coast
    Posts
    3,803
    Quote Originally Posted by M-Rod View Post
    Damn... it's facing the wrong way. Anyway, where did you find that!?!?
    should be pretty easy to manufacture facing the right way for us I assume. Just gotta flip the bottom plate that connects to the lower plenum, and then flip the whole unit.. then again I don't know what the bottom of it looks like. If its not perfectly symmetrical, then this is not feasable lol

  5. #5
    uh, you guys realize the pic was taken from the back side of the engine (notice the oil cap is missing indicates rear valve cover)

  6. #6
    You are here entirely tooo much!! beam514's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-03-2007
    Location
    Socal/Central Coast
    Posts
    3,803
    we did. and the manifold is still facing the wrong way

  7. #7
    maybe it's designed for different setup than what we're accustomed to.

  8. #8
    Experienced TGC Member
    Join Date
    04-02-2009
    Location
    Denver Colorado
    Posts
    1,447
    Most likely something for a 3000GT perhaps...

    3G Eclipse Performance & Development - Denver, Colorado
    www.blackheartmotors.net

  9. #9
    deff from a 3kgt, I think that topic is on 3si.org if im not mistaken
    02 Diamante VRX 5spd swapped
    90 Galant GSX 5spd EvoSpec 4G63 swapped
    01 Sebring GT Coupe (6G75 Powered)(sold)

  10. #10
    Experienced TGC Member mysticj's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-18-2004
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    1,029
    it's for a Magna(Diamante)...
    94 Galant GS: 4G67 head, 1G IM, Evo 8 TB, DeltaCam 272/264 Cams, Test Pipe, OE Avenger V6 60mm catback w/muffler, modified Outlander header, DIY COP setup, B/S delete, 315cc injectors, AEM UEGO WBO2, Black case 3G ECU

    1994 GS FYI
    DSM/CSM Manuals

  11. #11
    Experienced TGC Member
    Join Date
    04-02-2009
    Location
    Denver Colorado
    Posts
    1,447
    So...why are they facing the intake feed to the passenger side?

    3G Eclipse Performance & Development - Denver, Colorado
    www.blackheartmotors.net

  12. #12
    maybe he has some sort of forced induction setup and the piping would be more efficient if it was on the other side?

    Webhosting for less than $3 a month? put "pinoyesv6" as a promo code.

  13. #13
    You are here entirely tooo much!! beam514's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-03-2007
    Location
    Socal/Central Coast
    Posts
    3,803
    yea I was gonng say it can't be for a 3000gt because the engine would not have been positioned correctly. The timing belt needs to be on the other side correct?

  14. #14
    Experienced TGC Member
    Join Date
    04-02-2009
    Location
    Denver Colorado
    Posts
    1,447
    Quote Originally Posted by pinoyesv6 View Post
    maybe he has some sort of forced induction setup and the piping would be more efficient if it was on the other side?
    Yea, you can see the intercooler (atleast I believe that's what it is), on the second picture, no way you would get good efficiency N/a with that kind of intake design so it's clearly an FI setup. It's a good design though if they are running a turbo on the rear to keep things a little cleaner looking.

    Quote Originally Posted by beam514 View Post
    yea I was gonng say it can't be for a 3000gt because the engine would not have been positioned correctly. The timing belt needs to be on the other side correct?
    I totally spaced that lol...

    3G Eclipse Performance & Development - Denver, Colorado
    www.blackheartmotors.net

  15. #15
    wow I totally thought that was a custom 3kgt sohc engine lol
    02 Diamante VRX 5spd swapped
    90 Galant GSX 5spd EvoSpec 4G63 swapped
    01 Sebring GT Coupe (6G75 Powered)(sold)

  16. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by pinoyesv6 View Post
    maybe he has some sort of forced induction setup and the piping would be more efficient if it was on the other side?
    My exact thoughts!

    If you notice between the power steering reservoir and the headlight there is an opening cut most likely for the IC piping to reach the IM using about 1/5 the distance of standard pipe routing.
    '99 5-Speed GTZ: Forged 3.6L 6G74T 6764 E85
    2017: 552whp/562wtq SBE on 19psi
    '02 Eclipse GT: 6G72 M/T-swapped Daily Driver
    '10 Endeavor: 6G75 AWD Family-mobile

  17. #17
    Experienced TGC Member ZigenScarface's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-04-2004
    Location
    Westchester NY
    Posts
    1,332
    thats TJ's new setup

  18. #18
    Official TGC Pop-Pop Fishboy55's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-31-2002
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Posts
    2,848
    Quote Originally Posted by ZigenScarface View Post
    thats TJ's new setup
    Can't you let the dead rest in peace, please?
    Chip

    2000 Basalt Black Metallic GTZ
    (Paint Code: Porsche LC9Z)

    Genuine experience carries a lot more credibility than the ability to answer a question.


  19. #19
    i have thought of something just like that a year or two ago. would free up some power just in n/a too.

    Member since October '03

  20. #20
    You are here entirely tooo much!! beam514's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-03-2007
    Location
    Socal/Central Coast
    Posts
    3,803
    hmmm I'm still wondering how it bolts to the lower manifold.. of maybe it's welded to it

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •