The Galant Center - Powered by vBulletin

Thread: evoscan dyno??

Showing results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1

    evoscan dyno??

    how accurate is evoscan dyno??
    STAY READY AND YOU WONT HAVE TO GET READY!!

  2. #2
    my car profile is:

    factory weight-3400
    driver-230
    tire diameter-24.3
    3rd gear ratio-1.407
    final drive ratio-3.736
    frontal area-?
    wtd coefficient-0.95

    not sure this is right
    STAY READY AND YOU WONT HAVE TO GET READY!!

  3. #3
    i know some say they are not accurate and some say there close
    STAY READY AND YOU WONT HAVE TO GET READY!!

  4. #4
    Experienced TGC Member
    Join Date
    04-02-2009
    Location
    Denver Colorado
    Posts
    1,447
    Use Virtual Dyno instead

    3G Eclipse Performance & Development - Denver, Colorado
    www.blackheartmotors.net

  5. #5
    Senior TGC Member Isaurio's Avatar
    Join Date
    06-13-2008
    Location
    Bronx, NY
    Posts
    2,606
    Matt the new evoscan 2.9 added/ build in virtual dyno to the code. I mean we could use ether one.

    I would say for tuners or more advance user with evoscan could use 2.9

    For people less advance that just want to see hp virtual numbers could use the stand alone Virtual Dyno.
    Last edited by Isaurio; 02-26-2012 at 12:03 PM

    Triple Diamond Motors East Cost
    02 2.5L Fully Built Galant 5 speed
    SOHC Turbo
    http://www.thegalantcenter.org/showthread.php?52330-Isaurio-s-Turbo-Built-quot-4G64T-quot-Heavy-pics>My 4G64 Turbo Built

  6. #6
    well i ran it again on the 2.8v with 2 diff logs and it said 224hp and 254tq.but when i use the 2.9 its between 50hp and 328hp
    STAY READY AND YOU WONT HAVE TO GET READY!!

  7. #7
    Senior TGC Member Isaurio's Avatar
    Join Date
    06-13-2008
    Location
    Bronx, NY
    Posts
    2,606
    Umm stock. I dont know about that. You need to be 100% accurate with the settings on evoscan. Gear ratio and the weigh even the wind dynamic could affect the readings. So double check your numbers and try again.

    Triple Diamond Motors East Cost
    02 2.5L Fully Built Galant 5 speed
    SOHC Turbo
    http://www.thegalantcenter.org/showthread.php?52330-Isaurio-s-Turbo-Built-quot-4G64T-quot-Heavy-pics>My 4G64 Turbo Built

  8. #8
    haha im sure those are not the hp numbers lol
    STAY READY AND YOU WONT HAVE TO GET READY!!

  9. #9
    Senior TGC Member Isaurio's Avatar
    Join Date
    06-13-2008
    Location
    Bronx, NY
    Posts
    2,606
    Check club3g and see their v6 settings. Just add a few pounds more since the g is heavier than the eclipse.

    Triple Diamond Motors East Cost
    02 2.5L Fully Built Galant 5 speed
    SOHC Turbo
    http://www.thegalantcenter.org/showthread.php?52330-Isaurio-s-Turbo-Built-quot-4G64T-quot-Heavy-pics>My 4G64 Turbo Built

  10. #10
    Experienced TGC Member
    Join Date
    04-02-2009
    Location
    Denver Colorado
    Posts
    1,447
    Quote Originally Posted by Isaurio View Post
    Matt the new evoscan 2.9 added/ build in virtual dyno to the code. I mean we could use ether one.

    I would say for tuners or more advance user with evoscan could use 2.9

    For people less advance that just want to see hp virtual numbers could use the stand alone Virtual Dyno.
    Yea I know about the EvoScan dyno, everybody who bought the software gets emails for the software updates.

    With what we have been doing for tuning, and comparison to the actual dyno numbers of the tuned vehicles, Virtual Dyno has been more accurate with less hassle and is much easier to use since they keep adding more vehicles to that database with everything already set in place.


    You can use either one, we just prefer the Virtual Dyno for the power graph information rather than the datalogging software's version

    3G Eclipse Performance & Development - Denver, Colorado
    www.blackheartmotors.net

  11. #11
    Senior TGC Member underated's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-08-2004
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    2,099
    i posted the setting you need for a 5speed v6 galant over on GT

    but here they are for the 5speed 4 and 6 galants

    i thought this might help some people with accurate readings on VD. Just copy this into notepad and you can change what you need but leave the format, gear ratios, drag coefficient, and frontal area. be sure to add .xml to the file name when saving. and note that if you update the program it will erase the file so back it up and copy into the new folder after updating.


    <?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?>
    <CarDataset xmlns="http://tempuri.org/CarDataset.xsd">
    <CarParameters>
    <CarMake>Mitsubishi</CarMake>
    <CarModel>Galant</CarModel>
    <CarSubModel>GST 5speed</CarSubModel>
    <StartYear>2001</StartYear>
    <EndYear>2001</EndYear>
    <Weight>2822</Weight>
    <TransTypeManual>true</TransTypeManual>
    <TransGear3>1.379</TransGear3>
    <TransGear4>1.030</TransGear4>
    <FinalGearRatio>3.722</FinalGearRatio>
    <DragCoefficient>0.33</DragCoefficient>
    <FrontalArea>24.78</FrontalArea>
    <TireDiameter>24.9</TireDiameter>
    </CarParameters>
    </CarDataset>


    <?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?>
    <CarDataset xmlns="http://tempuri.org/CarDataset.xsd">
    <CarParameters>
    <CarMake>Mitsubishi</CarMake>
    <CarModel>Galant</CarModel>
    <CarSubModel>V6 5speed</CarSubModel>
    <StartYear>1999</StartYear>
    <EndYear>2003</EndYear>
    <Weight>3178</Weight>
    <TransTypeManual>true</TransTypeManual>
    <TransGear3>1.407</TransGear3>
    <TransGear4>1.031</TransGear4>
    <FinalGearRatio>3.736</FinalGearRatio>
    <DragCoefficient>0.33</DragCoefficient>
    <FrontalArea>24.78</FrontalArea>
    <TireDiameter>25.46</TireDiameter>
    </CarParameters>
    </CarDataset>
    Brandon - 2001 Galant GST 5speed
    Wiseco // Eagle // PTE // Holset // Turbonetics // Supertech // Blox // Prosport // Vibrant // Innovate // OpenEcu // Mishimoto // Magnaflow // Walbro // XXR // Rotora // Brembo // Hawk // R1 Concepts // Dc Sports


  12. #12
    I'm assuming SPD_FRK hasn't actually used the new EvoScan v2.9 Virtual Dyno based on his comments. He is probably basing it on an EvoScan version <=2.8 from 14 months ago, it was terrible, I must admit, lol.

    EvoScan v2.9 was rewritten from the ground up. and it had over 100 sample dyno charts checked for accuracy during beta testing. As for easiness, EvoScan is 10 times easier, because you don't have to open notepad or excel, delete rows, open another program, drag, drop.. thats not very easy, nor convenient. EvoScan will graph power/torque in realtime during logging, even across multiple runs (i.e. slow down and go again, EvoScan will log two seperate power runs automatically based on TPS), without having to chop up any log files into separate files or anything.

    Thanks underated, I'll add those to the next auto update for EvoScan v2.9.0020

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •